It was always going to be a complicated awards season for Andy Serkis. The actor who built an entire performance language out of dots on his face — first as Gollum, then as Caesar, then as King Kong — is now in the middle of two separate conversations the industry has been trying to avoid having at the same time: artificial intelligence in film production, and whether a George Orwell adaptation can survive American culture-war Twitter.

Speaking to Variety in an interview published this week, Serkis addressed the “outrage” that has greeted early awareness of his Animal Farm movie in some corners of the US. The project, a live-action and performance-capture adaptation of Orwell's 1945 allegorical novella, has attracted pointed attention over how its themes might land in the current political climate. Serkis did not back away from the material.

On The Hunt for Gollum — his return to Middle-earth as both performer and director, in development for Warner Bros. and New Line Cinema — Serkis confirmed that AI tools featured in the production workflow. He framed the technology as a continuation rather than a rupture: performance capture itself was once the thing the industry did not know how to categorise, and now it is a discipline with its own practitioners, its own craft vocabulary, and still, notably, no Oscar category.

That last point is the one Serkis has been making in public since roughly 2002. The Academy has so far declined to act. His position, repeated here, is that performance capture constitutes acting and should be judged as acting. The argument has not moved the votes yet, but the release of two high-profile Serkis projects inside the same calendar window gives it renewed oxygen heading into the next nominations cycle.

The Hunt for Gollum does not yet have a confirmed release date. Animal Farm is in post-production.