A retired couple holding roughly $8 million in traditional IRAs went to a financial advice columnist this week with a question that most Americans will never have occasion to ask: should we drain a portion of it to buy a house in cash and just eat the tax bill?

Their reasoning, as relayed in the MarketWatch column published Monday, is straightforward enough. “We would rather pay taxes upfront than pay mortgage interest,” the couple wrote. The logic is not obviously wrong. What is less obvious is the size of the upfront.

Traditional IRA withdrawals are taxed as ordinary income in the year they are taken. Pull enough in a single calendar year to cover a cash home purchase and the couple could vault deep into the 37 percent federal bracket on the overage — potentially paying more to the IRS in that one year than they would have paid in cumulative mortgage interest over a standard 30-year term.

A phased multi-year withdrawal strategy, Roth conversion laddering, or simply financing the purchase were among the alternatives the column raised. State income tax, Medicare premium surcharges triggered by elevated income, and the net investment income tax add further texture to the arithmetic.

The home's purchase price was not disclosed in the filing — which is to say, in the question.